Which example of a rhetorical device in Mandela's address is most effective in adding a lyrical quality as well as presenting listeners with divisive contrasts? Click here to reference Nelson Mandela's Nobel Prize address. By offering thanks and congratulations to others in paragraph 2, the speaker sets an amiable tone for his audience. By acknowledging differences between the subjects listed in paragraph 5, the speaker better prepares listeners for his reasoning on these topics. By using a "neither-nor" form of reasoning (paragraph 14), the speaker presents a common fallacy in reasoning, thus sidetracking listeners toward other legitimate causes and solutions. By beginning each sentence of his conclusion (paragraphs 38-40) with these repeated words, the speaker assists his audience in remembering the summary of his speech.

How do to my dear loving husband and to the kings most excellent majesty's reflect cultural values of their time

Read the lines from "there was a child went forth" and answer the question. and the apple-trees cover'd with blossoms, and the fruit afterward, and wood-berries, and the commonest weeds by the road; and the old drunkard staggering home from the out-house of the tavern, whence he had lately risen, and the school-mistress that pass'd on her way to the school, and the friendly boys that pass'd—and the quarrelsome boys, and the tidy and fresh-cheek'd girls—and the barefoot negro boy and girl, and all the changes of city and country, wherever he went. which poetic device is exemplified in this stanza? select all that apply. allegory anaphora imagery metaphor

From the story " saving the children"why is nicholas winton honored today? why did jewish people in czechoslovakia want to get their children out of the country? where did nicholas winton do his work saving the children? why was it hard for winton to find refuge for the children? to confirm your understanding, write a summary of “saving the children.”(a) aside from winton, who were the interview subjects? (b) analyze what do most of the interview subjects have in common? (a) why wasn’t this story told until 50 years later? (b) infer what does this say about winton’s character? summarize how did winton finally manage to get the children out of czechoslovakia? (a) support what was the “lie” hugo meisl’s parents told hugo and his brother before they sent them away? (b) make a judgment was this the right thing to do? explain. essential question: how do we remember the past? what have you learned about the nature of heroism from reading this article?