4. How do the results of Albert Bandura's experiment support
Zimbardo's theories about immoral
behavior? (Paragraphs 6-8)

A They illustrate the idea that
people are more likely to hurt
those they see as less than
human,

B They illustrate the idea that
people can be persuaded into
believing something is right if they
trust their leader,

C They illustrate the idea that
people are more likely to do evil
things if they see their peers
taking part in the action,

D They illustrate the idea that
people can be manipulated by the
allure of power and control over
others.

The results of the experiment were important as A. They illustrate the idea that people are more likely to hurt those they see as less than human.

It should be noted that an experiment is typically conducted by a researcher in order to get an information.

In this case, the results of Albert Bandura's experiment supported

Zimbardo's theories about immoral behavior as they illustrated the idea that people are more likely to hurt those they see as less than human.

Learn more about experiments on:

link

A. They illustrate the idea that  people are more likely to hurt  those they see as less than  human.

Explanation:

In a 1975 experiment by the renowned psychologist Albert Bandura, he told a group of college students that they would work with other students from a different school on a group assignment.

In one scenario, the students overheard an instructor calling the other students "animals" and in another scenario, the other students were called "nice".

Albert Bandura discovered that the students who were called "animals" were prone to higher levels of "electrical shock" by the other students.  

According to Zimbardo, he believed that people were more seduced to do evil if they dehumanized others, degraded, and labeled them.

Therefore, the correct answer is A They illustrate the idea that  people are more likely to hurt  those they see as less than  human,

yes yes it does !