subject
English, 15.07.2020 20:01 RoyalGurl01

This leaving the huskies to shift for themselves, gives rise to peculiar ethics in the North Land. A man who steals food from another is shot down without mercy. But it is different in the case of the dogs. Should a man catch one, red-handed, gorging his last piece of bacon, he may not shoot him. If he does, the dog's owner can come down upon him for his value as a draught-animal. A miners' meeting usually settles the amount. Nor is this any insignificant sum, for the prices of sled dogs range from one to five hundred dollars, and in times of need as high as a thousand. Which best explains London’s purpose for comparing the consequences of stealing for a man and for a husky? London uses the comparison to persuade readers that huskies sometimes steal food from humans. London uses the comparison to inform the reader that huskies are viewed as property worth money. London uses the comparison to entertain the reader with a story about a husky that stole bacon. London uses the comparison to inform the reader that humans and huskies are treated as equals

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:30
What are the benefits of secondary source
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:10
Match each mode of narration to the excerpt in which it is used.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
The reader can conclude that the passage is part of an epic poem because rama
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
Why does the green knight laugh at their response
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
This leaving the huskies to shift for themselves, gives rise to peculiar ethics in the North Land. A...
Questions
question
English, 30.03.2021 22:50
Questions on the website: 13722361