Please help super fast Consider an instance in a job you’ve had— one that is likely to occur in the field you plan on entering— that involves competing demands for a limited resource like time, money, equipment (tools), or number of workers. Think about how you (or someone else) thought (or might think) about how to best allocate the resources that had competing demands placed upon them. Now think about how you could better allocate the resources than you (or someone else) did. Your post should include: A general description of the situation A description of the competing needs or objectives Which resources were needed Which factors were considered in how to allocate the resources Which factors should have been considered but weren’t—and why Which factors should not have been considered—and why

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

You make a necklace using blue.purple and green beads in aratio of 1: 1: 2.you use atotal of 168 beads. how many green beads are in the necklace

Ihave no idea what the explanation is.