Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages? Both passages show the historical details that led the abolitionists to support the American Revolution. Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people. Both passages support the claim that intelligent people will overcome harmful governments. Both passages show that there was little connection between the sugar trade and the rise of slavery in North America.

The correct answer is (B) Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people.

Explanation:

Got it right on Edge!

Normally I don't ask because I feel like its a little rude but can I have brainliest I've never had a brainliest answer. Check my profile just in case you don't believe me.

the correct answer is B .

Explanation:

edge2020 .

have a gr8 day mate .!

the answer should be a)directions.

d becuase khgfdwhat effect does the word head have on the meaning of this passage?

a. it demonstrates how intelligent he was.

b. it shows he was a favorite of the teachers.

c. it indicates he would be a good preacher.

d. it reveals how self-important he was.

how does the choice of the word head contribute to the passage’s tone?

a. it offers a sense of entitlement.