subject
English, 16.06.2020 20:57 justice808

Im bored how is everyone doin lol You can do this if ya want xd Take a look at the following argument and its supportive evidence. There should be more severe consequences for students who come to school late. Students who typically arrive late will wake up earlier and leave home sooner. Which sentence best revises the supportive evidence? In addition, students who typically arrive late will wake up earlier and leave home sooner. However, students who typically arrive late will wake up earlier and leave home sooner. Finally, students who typically arrive late will wake up earlier and leave home sooner. As a result, students who typically arrive late will wake up earlier and leave home sooner.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:30
Read the excerpt from a student’s journal. i thought it would be stressful having to participate in a debate for my final exam. but with a partner to , it was actually a nice change of pace. we argued our case thoroughly, presenting lots of evidence. we even got to use the rebuttal we’d rehearsed. well, a year’s worth of research really paid off. which phrase from the passage best supports the conclusion that the student is describing a policy debate? argued our case thoroughly presenting lots of evidence the rebuttal we’d rehearsed a year’s worth of research
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
Which statement best completes its flow of reasoning
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:30
What parts of hamlet’s soliloquy support a more negative outlook on life?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
Read the argument below and answer the question that follows. all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. david is a football player. david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. what are the elements of this argument? a. premise: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. conclusion: david is a football player. b. premise: all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. conclusion: david is a football player. c. premise: david is a football player. conclusion: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. d. premise: all football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. david is a football player. conclusion: david is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Im bored how is everyone doin lol You can do this if ya want xd Take a look at the following argume...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.07.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 25.07.2021 08:10
Questions on the website: 13722361