A successful book review is one in which the reviewer's A. personal feelings about the book being reviewed are hidden.
B. efforts are limited to a retelling of the book's plot.
C. ideas are supported and clearly communicated to the reader.
D. literary perspectives play a minor role.

c.is the best ans.

I don't say u must have to mark my ans ans as brainliest but if u think it has really helped u plz don't forget to thnk me...

C. ideas are supported and clearly communicated to the reader.

Explanation:

A good book review is one that communicates a clear perspective on the book: was it good, or a flop? What was the material like?

Why not A: This can include their personal opinion. In fact, it probably should: books are different for each person.

Why not B: This is the opposite of what a book review should be! It should not be a synopsis. It should be a review, not a summary.

Why not D: Literary perspectives should play the primary role! It's literature. It needs a literary treatment.

a myth is something that is told for many years that u go looking for and cant find and a truth is something that u can find in real life and can be story's of for example:

mermaid's and unicorns: u can't find them at all so they can be a myth cause u hear story's about them once u go looking for them u won't find them.

dinassours(can't spell): u hear story's about them at school by ur friends and one day ur dad takes u to a museum and u find fossils of them so u realize they are real and not fake.

the correct answer is c. he speculates on what might happen at given points in the future in a world without people. alan h. weisman is an american author, professor, and journalist. authors organize their information with a purpose. they present their ideas in an organized way. this is called text structure. weisman uses text structure so as to improve overall comprehension and to prove his points.