Which statement BEST explains the difference in the two authors'
arguments?
A) Vaccinations provides the topic for both authors.
B)
Both authors state that parents have the right to
decide whether or not to vaccinate their children.
The first author argues that all children should be
o vaccinated, and the second author argues that
vaccines will harm children.
D)
The first author argues that most children should be
vaccinated, and the second author argues that many
children do not need to be vaccinated.

D)

The first author argues that most children should be

vaccinated, and the second author argues that many

children do not need to be vaccinated.

Explanation: D is the correct formulated option, since both of the authors goals are to persuade parents into whether their child is to be vaccinated or not. Thus cutting to the chase. In arguments like these, authors would rather focus on persuasion, backed up by evidence, especially in critical arguments like these (based on the health of children).

fond of fighting is the answer