Which excerpt most accurately shows why Douglass wrote this narrative?

"In learning to read, I owe almost as much to the bitter opposition of my master, as to the kindly aid of my mistress. I acknowledge the benefit of both..."
"When I was sent of errands, I always took my book with me, and by going one part of my errand quickly, I found time to get a lesson before my return."
"'...if you teach that [slave] (speaking of myself) how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave.'"
"This bread I used to bestow upon the hungry little urchins, who, in return, would give me that more valuable bread of knowledge."

the answer to the question is d. i took the test a second ago and got a 100 on it. hope this .

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

never read it so if i had i would definitely you sorry.