Evidence #1: There is no narrator in Shakespearean plays.
Evidence #2: The stage directions in Shakespearean plays are sparse.

Which option represents the best inference one could draw based upon the pieces of evidence?

Shakespeare wrote the concept of a narrator was created.
Shakespeare was more interested in language than plot.
Shakespeare replied heavily upon dialogue for characterization.
Shakespeare's plays contained little action.

animal farm, written by george orwell, is a representation of russia after the revolution that led stalin to take over power.

in this excerpt, the central idea seems to be that the animals (a representation of society), when they believe to be working for a greater good and equality, are obedient and productive. they were convinced that, after expelling the owner (jones) from the farm, they would live in harmony and be fairly treated.

as we know, the pigs become the leaders and grow more selfish and dictatorial with time. in the end, they look and act in a way so similar to humans that it is impossible to tell the difference. the ideals of equality are shattered, and the farm turns out to be worse than it was before. the animals are manipulated with false propaganda and forced to work in order to enrich the pigs.

all you have to do is draw a line and copy what is on the paper

i believe it is b, but i could be wrong. im pretty sure im right tho. ; )