How do details from the excerpts support the purpose advocating for children from Central American

The options are

Both include information that ask people to help children from Central America.

Both offer solutions that show how victims from other countries have been helped.

The excerpt from Enrique's Journey uses quotations to show that it is better for these children to be sent back, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses examples describing how other countries have dealt with the issue.

The excerpt from Enrique's Journey tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.

The answer is The excerpt from Enrique's Journey helps tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.