Webster, Worcester, and Boarell define a citizen to be
a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold
How does Susan B. Anthony connect with the emotions
of women in this passager
The only goestion left to be settled now is: Are women
persons? I hardly believe any of our opponents
hare the barbood to say they are not. Being persons
then women wezens, and no state has a right to
make law, or to entore og old law, that she
by mentioning site constitutions
by mentioning the idea that women are not people
by mentioning Webster, Worcester, and Bouvie
by mentioning the nights of African Americans
Izso the seatztes is toczy el aná vod, precisely
as is everyone agéenstlegrous.
-On Women's Right to Vote.
Susan B. Anthony

If i could eat anything rn what would it be ? (options are mcdonalds, chick-fil-a, burger king, pizza hut, kfc, taco bell, jack in da box, or chipotle)

Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.

If the court issues an injunction against the school's rule, will the petitioning students be glad or upset?