Which is the best comparison of a speech focusing on a problem and a speech focusing on a policy?

problem: uses a causal order to analyze the effects of an alleged problem
policy: uses a problem-solution order to suggest remedies to a known problem

problem: uses a cause-and-consequence scenario (common topic) to present the problem
policy: uses an analogy (common topic) to compare remedies to a known problem

problem: uses logos to prove the effects of an alleged problem
policy: uses extrinsic ethos to present the need to introduce a policy

problem: uses a topical order to list

the pronoun reference replaces a noun, but you have to make sure there's no room for confusion.

in the first sentence "her" could be referring to shely or to the sister. the answer there is "shelly called her sister and told her about the new baby."

in the second sentence "it" could be referring to the roof or the floor. the answer there is "since the roof leaks on the family room floor, we need to repair the roof."

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest