How are the details of both Roderick's and Madeline's

illnesses important to the development of the plot?

A Their sicknesses reflect the decay of the estate and

their familial line.

B Madeline is near death, while Roderick's sensitivity

(or possible hypochondria) prevents him from leaving

the house, ensuring the end of their line.

Madeline's cataleptic condition leads to her early

burial, while Roderick's heightened senses forces him

to hear her struggle to break out of the tomb, driving

him mad.

D Madeline's weakened condition permits Roderick to

take advantage and kill her off, symbolically killing his

own illness/self, but his heightened senses send him

into madness over his guilt.

Answer is B) Madeline is near death, while Roderick's sensitivity (or possible hypochondria) prevents him from leaving the house, ensuring the end of their line.

Refer below.

Explanation:

Therefore,

Details of both Roderick's and Madeline's illnesses important to the development of the plot Madeline is near death, while Roderick's sensitivity (or possible hypochondria) prevents him from leaving the house, ensuring the end of their line.

Madeline is near death, while Roderick's sensitivity (or possible hypochondria) prevents him from leaving the house, ensuring the end of their line.

Explanation:

So it affect the plot maybe making the plot unfinished or not being able to pay the workers so it's important to the development of the plot.

i used to know but i learned it a long time ago sorry

explanation:

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.