subject
English, 01.04.2020 01:35 liltay12386

PART B: Which TWO details from the text best support the answer to Part A?
A. “The unique nature of California agriculture requires that these migrants exist,
and requires that they move about. Peaches and grapes, hops and cotton
cannot be harvested by a resident population of laborers.” (Paragraph 3)
B. “The migrants are needed, and they are hated. Arriving in a district they find the
dislike always meted out by the resident to the foreigner, the outlander.”
(Paragraph 4)
C. “But in recent years the foreign migrants have begun to organize, and at this
danger signal they have been deported in great numbers, for there was a new
reservoir from which a great quantity of cheap labor could be obtained.”
(Paragraph 6)
D. “The earlier foreign migrants have invariably been drawn from a peon class. This
is not the case with the new migrants.” (Paragraph 12)
E. “They are resourceful and intelligent Americans who have gone through the hell
of the drought, have seen their lands wither and die and the topsoil blow away”
(Paragraph 14)
F. “They have come from the little farm districts where democracy was not only
possible but inevitable, where popular government, whether practiced in the
Grange, in church organization or in local government, was the responsibility of
every man.” (Paragraph 24)

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which statement best describes the narrator's reliability? the narrator is unreliable because o she does not reveal how old she is until the end of the passage.
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 20:30
How would “in a station or the metro” change of the bough was bright and lovely rather than wet and black a: the station would seem cheerier b: the poem would not be considered imagist c: the people would seem less pleasant. d: the poem would no longer be hokku
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Which is these is not a benefit of parallel structure? a)clarity b)classification c)emphasis d)balance
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
PART B: Which TWO details from the text best support the answer to Part A?
A. “The unique natu...
Questions
question
Biology, 10.02.2022 01:00
question
Mathematics, 10.02.2022 01:00
question
Mathematics, 10.02.2022 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722363