1)
Wavy bands of light and dark minerals visible in gneiss bedrock probably formed from the
A)cementing together of individual miner grains
B)cooling and crystallization of magma
C)evaporation of an ancient ocean
D) heat and pressure during metamorphism
2) Which physical characteristic best describes the rock phyllite?

A) glassy texture with gas pockets
B) clastic texture with angular fragments
C) bioclastic texture with cemented shell fragments
D) foliated texture with microscopic mica crystals
3) Which nonfoliated rock forms only in a zone of contact metamorphism?

A) conglomerate
B) hornfels
C) pegmatite
D) quartzite
Which sedimentary rock is most likely to be changed to slate during regional metamorphism?

A) breccia
B) conglomerate
C) dolostone
D) shale
6) How do the metamorphic rocks schist and quartzite differ?

A) Quartzite contains the mineral quartz and schist does not.
B) Quartzite forms from regional metamorphism and schist does not.
C) Schist is organically formed and quartzite is not.
D) Schist is foliated and quartzite is not.
8) Which rock has never melted, but was produced by great heat and pressure, which distorted and rearranged its minerals?
A)siltstone
B)breccia
C)pegmatite
D)metaconglomerate
9)Which two rocks usually consist of only one mineral, but may contain additional minerals?
A)hornfels and diorite
B)quartzite and dunite
C)rock salt and basalt
D)gabbro and bituminous coal

ikk

explanation:

gg

explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

the answer is b b- it makes him angry that malcolm didn't trust him.