Medical Investigator: "Podiatrists initially assumed that Meyer's Rash, an itchy rash between the toes, was a fungal infection similar to athlete's foot. At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature. All anti-fungal medications proved utterly ineffective in addressing Meyer's Rash. Now, recent antibody studies seem to suggest, quite surprisingly, that Meyer's Rash is caused by a virus."

In the medical investigator's argument, the portion in boldface plays

In the medical investigator's argument, this portion:

At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature.

Presents an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.

Explanation:

This is the correct answer as at the time, Dr, Pannikar was the only one giving this explanation, but lately the main conclusion was proven by science.

This judgment does not oppose the argument.

It is not a finding, it is an explanation itself.

It does not provide evidence though, it is only an explanation but it is part of the main conclusion of the argument.

i am a strong (insert gender here) my father and his brother were to, they were killed not by the cold, not by the bears or wolves that roam our streets at night, but by the   bolsheviks. we must stand up and fight communism or we all end up dead, starved dehydrated, enslaved. the time is now we must fight. lenin is a dangerous man but he can be stopped. so my comrades we shall siege there weapons tonight on ward. (rides away with ak(not invented yet) and sword in hand while on bear into snowstorm)