How does the author's use of the word "assaulted" in paragraph 2 contribute to our
understanding of Hitler's propaganda?
It emphasizes that the German government's propaganda campaign was
forceful.
It shows that German citizens would not readily believe propaganda,
It reveals that German citizens were physically attacked with propaganda.
It shows readers that German citizens didn't like the propaganda they were
exposed to.

what are the question answer options?

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

industrialization in great britain began with the global 'industrial revolution', a pioneer. industrialization in russia was the last in europe, a laggard.

great britain’s industrialization was driven by individual citizens, while russia’s was guided by the government.