Listen to this radio version of "Report on the Barnhouse Effect." How does this version differ from your interpretation of the lesson’s reading selection? Compared to a textual version, how does an audio version influence the tone and development of the story?

In the lesson's reading, the narrator explains the reasons for writing the report on the Barnhouse Effect. The narrator, Professor Barnhouse's former student, relates his encounterswith the professor and how he witnessed dynamopsychism. He also relates how the government tried to use Professor Barnhouse as a weapon against other nations and how theprofessor chose instead to use his gift for peace. The story ends with the narrator realizing that Professor Barnhouse had passed on his gift to him.In the audio version, the narrator introduces the story by analyzing how the human mind works, and he speaks about breakthroughs in hypnosis and telepathy. The music and background sounds help enhance the sci-fi theme and the suspenseful details of the story. In the audio version, the narrator is a man named George Clinton. Clinton writes a report about his time with Professor Arthur Barnhouse and describes what the professor called dynamopsychism, or the conversion of thoughts into reality. The audio version also differs toward the end. Clinton is called upon to help track the professor, but he fails to save the professor from foreign agents who want to harness the professor’s power. This intervention bythe narrator does not occur in the book. In the audio version, the professor kills himself so thatno one can use him to cause harm to other countries after his capture. In the reading, the professor's location is yet to be discovered. He is prepared to live in hiding and die a naturallyof old age.

Explanation:

clever.com

This is the answer to the question on the edmentum website for english three

Explanation:

The narrator pokes fun at the general’s frantic behavior. The sentence lends a light-hearted tone to the story and also highlights a sarcastic and ironic tone, making the general’s actions appear senseless, hysterical, and frivolous—adjectives typically not used to describe a general.