Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this
story was written for children?
The story is set in a forest.
The battle was won by a trick.
The excerpt describes a battle.
The characters are talking animals.

The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don’t exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children’s books are not realistic.

By providing an emotional image (ive read this passage so lol)