A throng of bearded men, in sad-colored garments and gray, steeple-crowned hats, intermixed with women, some wearing hoods, and others bareheaded, was assembled in front of a wooden edifice, the door of which was heavily timbered with oak, and studded with iron spikes. Which best describes the effect of the words "sad-colored," "steeple-crowned," and "iron spikes"?

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:

A throng of bearded men, in sad-colored garments and gray, steeple-crowned hats, intermixed with women, some wearing hoods, and others bareheaded, was assembled in front of a wooden edifice, the door of which was heavily timbered with oak, and studded with iron spikes. Which best describes the effect of the words "sad-colored," "steeple-crowned," and "iron spikes"?

A. They establish the mournful mood.

B. They establish the hostile mood.

C. They establish the austere Puritan setting.

D. They establish the spiritual Puritan setting.

The correct answer is letter C. They establish the austere Puritan setting.

Explanation:

The excerpt we are analyzing here was taken from Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel "The Scarlet Letter". The plot takes place in a Puritan environment, where religion and morals serve as an excuse to judge and condemn others harshly, no matter how big or small the sin. The Puritan Age was austere. People believed everyone was inevitably a sinner and should, therefore, repent greatly. They were strict in their morals and customs, and modest in their appearance. That is what the author intends to show when he uses expressions such as "sad-colored," "steeple-crowned," and "iron spikes": austerity, severity, stoniness of those people's lives and culture.

a. the man as a ruler

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.