What is the most ethical course of action the reporter could take?

investigate the claims without revealing that the pilot is her uncle; the fact that he is a relative will not affect her reporting
tell the editor-in-chief about her relationship to the pilot, and ask that the story be assigned to another reporter
convince the editor-in-chief not to run the story, because the reporter knows that her uncle is a skilled pilot and believes that the allegations are false
research and write the article, but have a colleague edit it before it is submitted to make sure there are no signs of bias

The most moral and ethical strategy is educate the proofreader in head regarding the relationship so an individual journalist can examine it is:

Option B

The code of morals of expert columnists energizes and values honesty, unprejudiced nature and decency.  Exploring an individual from the general public, who is a relative will undoubtedly cause some inclination or fair-mindedness in the investigation.This would not be as indicated by the morals and ethics.

So while different codes might have a few contrasts, most offer normal components including the standards of honesty, precision, objectivity, unprejudiced nature, decency, and public responsibility, as these apply to the obtaining of newsworthy data and its ensuing spread to people in general.

Media ethics advances and protects qualities like a general regard forever and law and order and lawfulness. Media Ethics characterizes and manages moral inquiries regarding how media should utilize texts and pictures given by the residents.

Additionally, regardless of whether a legitimate examination is directed and the pilot is viewed as not liable, when the connection between the correspondent and the blamed is known, individuals will struggle trusting the story. Along these lines, it is ideal to allow one more columnist to research this matter.

Second methodology would be the most moral methodology a correspondent should take in such a circumstance. The chief ought to forever be made mindful of any issue.

In such case, all things considered, the supervisor in-boss will allot the story to another correspondent. Regardless of whether he demand the columnist to continue and be cautious about any inclination, the correspondent can pardon based on irreconcilable circumstance or any conceivable family struggle.

For more information, refer the following link:

link

The most ethical course of action would be to tell the editor in chief about the relationship so that a fellow reporter can investigate it.

Explanation:

you didnt put the link on, so i cant read the paraphrase