Taft was an earnest fellow, and he knew a tremendous amount about the law, but he
was not necessarily cut out to be a spectacular president. the primary problern for him was
reconciling two different groups within the republican party of that time. one half, the
progressive side, believed strongly in reform and in building up social programs--this was
the half most closely aligned with theodore roosevelt. the other half, which was more
conservative, was not as fervent as roosevelt, and desired a more moderate approach
government, with less interference in states' affairs. the politicians who belonged to boch
of these factions had prolonged conflicts, and taft was not skilled enough as a diplomat to
bridge the gap between them. when taft's first term was up, his presidency was not at
all secure.

can someone paraphrase this ?

Read this excerpt from "french and english" by g. k. chesterton. which type of essay does it represent? it is obvious that there is a great deal of difference between being international and being cosmopolitan. all good men are international. nearly all bad men are cosmopolitan. if we are to be international we must be national. and it is largely because those who call themselves the friends of peace have not dwelt sufficiently on this distinction that they do not impress the bulk of any of the nations to which they belong. international peace means a peace between nations, not a peace after the destruction of nations, like the buddhist peace after the destruction of personality. the golden age of the good european is like the heaven of the christian: it is a place where people will love each other; not like the heaven of the hindu, a place where they will be each other. and in the case of national character this can be seen in a curious way. it will generally be found, i think, that the more a man really appreciates and admires the soul of another people the less he will attempt to imitate it; he will be conscious that there is something in it too deep and too unmanageable to imitate. the englishman who has a fancy for france will try to be french; the englishman who admires france will remain obstinately english. a. narrative essay b. reflective essay c. expository essay d. persuasive essay