During the reign of king charles ii, england turned its back on puritanism and entered a more social period. which of the following happened during this period?

a. people became hermits
b. people became more social
c. people abandoned england altogether

People became more social during the reign of King Charles II, England turned its back on Puritanism and entered a more social period.

Explanation:

After the death of Charles I, it was almost the death of Puritanism and its reign and power. People became more social during the reign of king Charles II, England turned its back on Puritanism and entered a more social period.

Charles II was also known as the "Merry Monarch" who loved wine and enjoyed all the pleasures of his treasures. By the period of Queen Elizabeth, things changed drastically. She loved entertainment and sued every puritan that was against it. A new world of Literature was born through William Shakespeare with lots of other improvement in the society.

answer: yes

explanation: he's doug dimmadome, owner of the dimsdale dimmadome

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.