Read the following passage and then respond to the directions below.

i play professional basketball, and i gotta have the right equipment to get the job done. of all the things i need to be at my best, it's my shoes that make or break it for me. after all, i've got to travel up and down that court a hundred times a game.

for our city to be at the top of its game, it needs good shoes too, a commuter system that's top notch so our quality workers can get in and out of the city quickly and safely. less hassle means more productivity. that's why i encourage you to join me in voting "yes" on light rail.

explain how the argument illustrates endorsement and why that fallacy makes the argument weak.
also if you could explain that would be great