subject
English, 19.01.2020 03:31 Piglets1228

Are there any rhetorical devices in the text?

how can you a man for giving you what's already yours? how then can you him for giving you only part of what's already yours? you haven't even made progress, if what's being given to you you should have had already. that's not progress . and i love my brother lomax, the way he pointed out we're right back where we were in 1954. we're not even as far up as we were in 1954. we're behind where we were in 1954. there's more segregation now than there was in 1954. there's more racial animosity , more racial hatred, more racial violence today in 1964 than there was in 1954. where is the progress?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:30
Focus question: miss maudie says, “atticus finch is the same in his house as he is in public” (61). what evidence so far proves this true?
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
Auden's musée des beaux arts" and williams's "landscape with the fall oficarus" share which common element?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:30
Read the excerpt from henry wadsworth longfellow’s translation of an excerpt from dante’s inferno and answer the question. but inasmuch as never from this depth did any one return, if i hear true, without the fear of infamy i answer . . “the love song of j. alfred prufrock” begins with an excerpt from dante’s inferno. which two statements express how this source material contributes to the mood of the poem? click here to read the poem. the inferno excerpt introduces a mood of horror that eliot elaborates throughout the poem. the inferno excerpt introduces a mood of enthusiasm that eliot argues against throughout the poem. the inferno excerpt introduces a mood of boldness that eliot continues throughout the poem. the inferno excerpt introduces a mood of shame that eliot explores throughout the poem. the inferno excerpt introduces a mood of enlightenment that eliot mocks throughout the poem. next question ask for
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Are there any rhetorical devices in the text?

how can you a man for giving you what's...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363