How do the central ideas and time of the speech reflect satantas culture values?

The central ideas and time of the speech reflect Satanta's cultural values of tradition, peace, speaking passionately from the heart and appreciation & love for their land.

Explanation:

In the Kiowa tribe, Satanta was the predecessor. During the 1860s and 1870s, these Kiowa Indians carried out an interminable fight against the U.S. contravention to defend their land and means of life from their violation. The main resistance which the opposition faced came from Satanta who was also addressed as White Bear. Besides, being a forerunner of the tribe, his ability as a warrior was known to all. Satanta was also said to be a great orator that is why his nickname as given by the Americans was "The Orator of the Plains." His other qualities showed his values. He gave importance to peace and respected tradition. He said what he had to with passion and from his heart. He loved his land for which he resisted the U.S. transgression along with the other tribe members. So the central ideas and time of the speech help to portray these cultural values beautifully.

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.

i think its a bad thing why? one word flood