In a scattered protest think about the authors structure their article. why is this structure effective?

The article "In a scattered protest" the author makes use of the interviews and statements made by the people in their real lives and quotes them as it is. Only general statements are not used.

Explanation:

The article "In a scattered protest" speaks about the protest of the women living in Saudi Arabia. They want to fight for their rights and want to get the rights to drive vehicles like the men in that country.

The structure that the writer uses in the article is that the statements made by the people of that society who are directly affected by that protests and the ones who are fighting for it. Not only general statements are made in the article. The use of such statements by the people of that area makes it very effective because it provides the people with the examples to prove the point in the article. It also provides the real experiences of the people of that area making the article interesting to read.

the rhetorical devices that he used in "common sense" are syntax for his sentence structure and pathos for his emotion against the british unfairly treating the "americans" and logos of what documents that what happened to the pilgrims when they had the mayflower compact and how that the british were wanting to have one religion but the compact said for any religion to be accepted.

you should go do that

explanation: