In a well-constructed paragraph, compare and contrast the use of evidence and appeals in chamberlain and nehru’s speeches. cite evidence from the text to support your comparison.

i believe in a british empire witch though it should be its first duty to cultivate friendship with all the nations of the world should yet even if alone be self sustaining and self sufficient able to maintain its self against the competition of all it rivals
- i belie in a british empire chamberlain

to the people of india who's representatives we are we make an appeal to join us with faith and confidence in this great adventure. this is no time for petty destructive criticism no time for ill will or blaming others. we have to build the noble mansion of free india where all the children will dwell.
-a tryst with destiny nehru

based on the biblical principle philippians 4: 13 "i can do everything through christ who strengthens me." i agree that it is through him that we are given the strength to cope with every situation.

and based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32 "better to get angry slowly than to be a hero. better to be even-tempered than to capture a city."   i agree with the author of the passage to the extent that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are contemptuous, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and make sure to not hurt other people and their feelings are strong people.

c (: when ulrich considers throwing georg the flask

the correct order is:

you're your own worst enemy:

they're going to say what they say, but

their opinions aren't holding you

back. it's your self-defeatist

attitude that's keeping your work

from getting its due.