According to kant’s ideas in the groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, what is one way in which i can determine whether my actions respect other persons as end-in-themselves? they could reasonably accept my reasons for action. they have been coerced or manipulated into being treated in certain ways. my actions diminish their own ability to make free, autonomous choices. all of the above.

idk but i did find this

explanation:

in the story of the cowardly lion and the hungry tiger, we first see the two characters inside the empty throne room of ozma, bored and sadly very much aware of their uselessness as guardians. they talked about the good old days when they used to be feared. they proceeded to make up stories of how fearsome they were. the cowardly lion professed that he can tear men/women into pieces, while the hungry tiger said he would eat fat babies. but when they proceeded to act upon their words they were forced to realize that they were indeed harmless and good animals who would rather be called cowardly and hungry than harm a woman or eat a child.

which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens.

ojx svdskn ertop fgowkbg9up3 rhg9uornbir