"but is this simply part of the order of nature? is it because this land of ours is so poor that it cannot afford a decent life to those
who dwell upon it? no, comrades, a thousand times no! the soil of england is fertile, its climate is good, it is capable of
affording food in abundance to an enormously greater number of animals than now inhabit it. this single farm of ours would
support a dozen horses, twenty cows, hundreds of sheep-and all of them living in a comfort and a dignity that are now almost
beyond our imagining.
which event in russian history does the sentiment of this passage most point to?
the crowning of nicholas ii, and the bourgeois' enjoyment of luxuries
the start of world war i, and russia's hopes of benefitting from it
the beginning of collectivization, and the idea that all should share in wealth
the soviet famine, in which so many people died due to poorly planned policies

Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.