How should this excerpt be edited to make it more
objective?
students
iming that
or, should
person,
group
ings.
campus
with some
s the
ived with
o by including direct quotations from the professor about
his knowledge of the gambling ring
o by interviewing the department chairman and the
professor to get both sides of the story
o by removing the commentary that the professor is most
likely involved in the gambling ring
o by deleting the department chairman's and professor's
names from the article

Excerpt: Last night, Fairview police arrested six university students  for involvement in an illegal gambling ring. Today,  community leaders and university officials are claiming that  Professor Shuman, the students' academic advisor, should  also be arrested. Dr. Harris, the department chairperson,  reports that Schuman has recently started holding group  tutoring sessions in his campus office in the evenings.  Video footage from security cameras outside the campus  building shows him exiting on several occasions with  some of the accused students. Although Shuman denies  the gambling ring allegations, he was most likely involved  with this illegal activity.

 By removing the commentary that the professor is most likely involved in the gambling ring

Explanation:

If we want to have an objective article, we must include pieces of evidence and situation that are proving represented information. It has to be written with the facts and the commentaries by others, in this case, the professor, is considered as reliable information and they are not taken seriously so they can't be objective.

i believe the answer is a

idk

explanation: