The following language sample is used in an article by buckingham and kertesz (1976) as an example of neologistic jargon aphasia. the speaker is responding to the question "who is running the store? ": i don't know. yes, the bick, uh, yes i would say that the mick daysis nosis or chpickters. course, i have also missed on the carfter teck. do you know what that is? i've , uh, taken to ingish. they have been toast sosilly. they'd have been put to myafa and made palis and, uh, myadakal senda you. that is me alordisdus. that makes anacronous senda. analyze the excerpt above by carefully noting the kinds of mistakes made by the speaker. are there errors in morphology? in grammar? what types of words are correct (or correctly produced) and what types are incorrect? after you have finished your analysis, respond to these two questions in the space below: 1. how would you (based on your analysis) describe the condition of neological jargon aphasia? be sure to use details from the language sample in your description. 2. what part of the brain do you suspect this type of aphasia is associated with

First of all, jargon aphasia is always related to damage in the temporal lobe (particularly, in the Wernicke's area).

Now, given that the interviewed's speech presents nonwords like "bick", "chpickters" or "carfter", it is most likely that they were dealing with a neologistic aphasia, this is, no phonological relatedness to actual words that would reach the meaning intended by the speaker, but would resemble, at least phonetically, to others contained within the linguistic community.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

answer: hjnh

explanation:

hhjjk