Explain the paradox that miller refers to in the final section of the exposition. a paradox is a statement that seems to contradict itself, but may nevertheless suggest an important truth. how does the paradox illuminate the playwright's perspective on his subject?

what is the question?

explanation:

stating you point whats is aking you to write about?

the central idea is basically saying that juveniles that have committed a crime will not have the same consequences as the   adults that have. they will have a softer punishment than what the adults have that is harsh in some ways.

the answer is not b, and i don't think its a, so i choose either man's identity is found within the traditions of his ancestors   or language is a powerful tool, tell me if i was wrong or right by the way