(brainliest)
explain at least one reason why kohlberg's theory of moral development has been criticized as being too narrow. do you agree with the criticism?

( this is worth 15 points)

One of the best-known theories exploring some of these basic questions was developed by a psychologist named Lawrence Kohlberg. His work modified and expanded upon Jean Piaget's previous work to form a theory that explained how children develop moral reasoning.

Piaget described a two-stage process of moral development while Kohlberg's theory of moral development outlined six stages within three different levels. Kohlberg extended Piaget's theory, proposing that moral development is a continual process that occurs throughout the lifespan.

In recent years, Kohlberg's theory has been criticized as being Western-centric with a bias toward men (he primarily used male research subjects) and with having a narrow worldview based on upper-middle-class value systems and perspectives.

The Heinz Dilemma: Kohlberg's Approach to the Study of Moral Reasoning

Kohlberg based his theory on a series of moral dilemmas were presented to these participants and they were also interviewed to determine the reasoning behind their judgments of each scenario.

One example was "Heinz Steals the Drug." In this scenario, a woman has cancer and her doctors believe only one drug might save her. This drug had been discovered by a local pharmacist and he was able to make it for $200 per dose and sell it for $2,000 per dose. The woman's husband, Heinz, could only raise $1,000 to buy the drug. He tried to negotiate with the pharmacist for a lower price or to be extended credit to pay for it over time. But the pharmacist refused to sell it for any less or to accept partial payments. Rebuffed, Heinz instead broke into the pharmacy and stole the drug to save his wife. Kohlberg asked, "Should the husband have done that?"

Kohlberg was not interested so much in the answer to questioning whether Heinz was wrong or right but in the reasoning for each participant's decision. The responses were then classified into various stages of reasoning in his theory of moral development.

and no i dotn agree

Explanation:

explanation:

sacrifice is a phenomenon that is largely lacking in modern society. in the era of consumer philosophy and selfish goals, people began to forget about disinterested motives that bring not material but moral satisfaction.

it is very good that the attention of schoolchildren and students is attracted to sacrifice through writing academic papers. the curriculum of educational institutions includes a wide variety of topics connected with this issue. young people express their views and share experiences regarding parental disinterested love, spiritual growth through sacrifice, functions of this phenomenon in family and social relations.

if you are on this page, for sure, you also have to perform a similar task. perhaps, you need to write a “sacrifice in sport” essay. pedagogues especially like to assign something like a “sacrifice of a teacher” essay so that students know what hard work is being done for the sake of their good. there can be many different options.

whatever the topic is, you do not have to worry. it is quite easy to write a quality essay if you have sufficient information and know the basic rules. in this article, the sacrifice is considered from different angles and points of view, so you will definitely learn a lot of useful information.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)