7. after reading fred veilleux's essay "indians are a people. not mascots" (lesson 3), has the author convinced you that indians should not be used as mascots? (4 points) i
i don't think indians should have to be macots becuase they are people. american idians are against derogtory and harmful stereotypes
sentence frame you can use the ll review). veillexux has convinced/has not convinced me that indians should not be used as a
mascot because . for example, one of his arguments is . he specifically states" ". this is a
strong argument/not a strong argument because
8. what argument did the author use that made you believe indians should/should not be used as mascots? (4 points)

to operate a business

hope this !

when connie willis was 12 years old, her mother died. in january of 2003, willis was interviewed for locus magazine. she recognized that death is a major issue in her writing, specially because the vacuous and appalling things that people tend to say in order to support you when someone you loved dies.

but there is another aspect that i have learned from connie willis's quote. in his famous work "danubio", the italian writer claudio magris describes literature as house removals. some messages reach us, other messages get lost in the labyrinth. those messages which are our inheritance teach us how to live and how to die, how to love and how to hate, how to laugh and how to cry. i think that tales really shape us if we listen to them. maybe through the stories we read we learn how to emphatize with others, knowing that the bells tolls for every each of us.