Julia is writing an essay comparing "children of the drug wars" and enrique's journey. she writes this topic sentence.
both nazario’s editorial and her biography bear witness to her background research.
which sentences from the texts best provide evidence to support this idea? select three options.
"judges, who currently deny seven in 10 applications for asylum by people who are in deportation proceedings, must better understand the conditions these children are facing."
"of course, many migrant children come for economic reasons, and not because they fear for their lives. in those cases, they should quickly be deported if they have at least one parent in their country of origin."
"countries neighboring syria have absorbed nearly 3 million people. jordan has accepted in two days what the united states has received in an entire month during the height of this immigration flow—more than 9,000 children in may."
"enrique tries to stay clean by finding bits of cardboard to sleep on. when he gets a bottle of water, he saves a little to wash his arms."
"two of [the migrants] are too frightened to go into town. they offer enrique 20 pesos and ask him to buy food. if he will bring it back, they will share it with him."
"in guatemala, soda is called agua. here in mexico, agua is water. a jacket is a chamarra, not a chumpa. a t-shirt is a playera, not a blusa."

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

i would pick a. i think this is more of a personal question though.

wood chucks can't chuck wood so no wood