Which statement best identifies the textual evidence that supports this conclusion? anger often clouds a person's judgment.

when an argument is over, how many weighty reasons does a man recollect which his heat and violence made him utterly forget?

if you search for truth only, it will be almost indifferent to you where you find it.

you may to add this consideration: that among your equals no one values your anger,

the interests, education, and means by which men obtain their knowledge are so very different that it is impossible they should all think alike;

The correct answer is actually the first option: When an argument is over, how many weighty reasons does a man recollect which his heat and violence made him utterly forget?

Explanation:

We are looking for textual evidence to support the conclusion that anger clouds a person't judgment. The only option that does so is the first one. To cloud one's judgment is an expression that refers to something's capacity to prevent someone from thinking clearly. For instance, getting drunk is often associated with clouding someone's judgment, since drunk people are often unable to think properly, and end up making wrong choices.

The first option supports the claim that anger prevents people from thinking clearly. After anger has subsided, when we are able to think calmly and reasonably again, we remember reasons, facts, information that were impossible to recollect while being angry. An angry person, thus, is only able to focus on the cause of their anger, but cannot see the bigger picture.

A). When an argument is over, how many weighty reasons does a man recollect which his heat and violence made him utterly forget?

Explanation:

A Conclusion is illustrated as the wrap-up of the story that functions to offer a sense of closure to the narrative including the restatement of central argument, key ideas, and major points along with the author's concluding remarks which are backed by the textual evidence and substantiating his/her judgment/conclusion.

As per the question, the textual evidence that best embraces the given conclusion would be option A as it functions to substantiate the author's conjecture that 'anger often darkens an individual judgment' and enhances its efficacy. Thus, option A is the correct answer.

the correct answer is aesthetics.

  one day samantha and her brother carson was walking in a path then samantha's brother carson almost stepped on something on the ground "carson, stop! " she shouted "huh, why? " he stopped "beacause, this" she says picking this mysterious object off of the ground it looked like a smart watch but there was another under it, one of them was gold one was silver. "woah, smart watches! " carson said "yeah, woah, you want gold or silver? " sam said "ummm, i'll take silver" carson smiled

  when they put it on it started to glow but no one was around, wafter 30 seconds of waiting a small silver dragon   came to carson, about the same time a golden lion came to samantha. "carson you need to get us some where safe so all of us can talk." the dragon said in his squeaky voice "by the way im silvester"   he said "we need to also samantha, im goldy." she said in her sqeaky voice.

  samantha and carson were suprised, scared and happy at the same time, so they took the little animals to their shed that nobody but them go into. "so where did you guys come from? " samantha said as they all sat down, "goldy and i, came from a far away land called zelda 101," silvester said "we are partners looking to find two human partners and you two are the perfect type, we could all be a team in zelda 101 and many other places that need certant things." goldy said "would you be willing? " silvester said

  "most definetly! " they both yelled "shh" silvester and goldy shouted. "ohh sorry" samantha and carson said.