Can someone me according to international law of europe in the late 18th century, there were only three ways that britain could take possession of another country. what were they?

a) if the country was uninhabited, britain could claim and settle that country. in this case, it could claim ownership of the land.

b) if the country was already inhabited, britain could ask for permission from the indigenous people to use some of their land. in this case, britain could purchase land for its own use but could not steal the land of the indigenous people.

c) if the country was already inhabited, they could ignore the indigenous people on the land so long as they did not challenge their settlement.

d) if the country was inhabited, britain could take over the country by invasion and conquest; in other words, defeat that country in war. however, even after winning a war, britain would have to respect the rights of indigenous people.

e) if the country was already inhabited, they could ask the indigenous people on the land for permission to use some of their land. if the response was no, they then could use force to settle the land.

How and why does king use the word redemptive to link the concepts of freedom and religious faith

Realism was a fairly influential and widespread literary movement in the united states in the latter half of the nineteenth century. which american writer is among the pioneers of american realism? a. ernest hemingway b. f. scott fitzgerald c. j. d. salinger d. mark twain

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.