Short paper on kant has to be plagerism free and not paraphrasedkant famously--and controversially--argued that some knowledge is "synthetic a priori." can you explain in your own words what kant might have meant by this, and can you give an example of the sort of knowledge that kant believed possessed this strange status? hint: to answer this question in a clear and well-organized manner, you might want to first explain and illustrate kant's distinction between a priori and a posteori knowledge and also his distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments. ensure that your essay addresses each component of the assigned questions and that your answer is well-organized, uses excellent, college-level prose, and makes judicious use of textual evidence. your essay should be 600-900 words long.

what is the question?

explanation:

a fable" i don’t have much to go on

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

shakespeare was famous for writing in iambic pentameter, which is a specific way of rhyming sonnet lines in ten syllables. there are also forms of unrhymed iambic pentameter, as in macbeth, with the noble characters.