Read the excerpts from does my head look big in
this? and persepolis.
excerpt from does my head look big in this? :
which statement is true about the narrators different
perspectives?
abc
my best friends, leila okulgen and yasmeen khan,
moved on to a public high school close to coburg, where
they live. i begged my parents to let me go with them but
mom and dad insisted that i go to a private school. i tried
everything. at first i sucked up to them big time, making
them coffee after dinner, offering to set the table before
mom had a chance to ask me, letting them watch pbs
documentaries when i wanted to watch big brother. that
didn't work. so i turned political, ranting about them
perpetuating the snobby bourgeoisie power trip of our
educational system which forges aristocratic divisions
between social classes (i got that from a pbs
documentary). talk about having no compassion or social
conscience. they just laughed at me and gave me a pile
amal is worried about how the political situation will
affect her education, while marjane is concerned with
people who are suffering.
amal is concerned about the suffering of people
around her, while marjane is concerned only with her
own suffering
amal and marjane are both dedicated to learning about
the political landscape and using their knowledge to
others.
amal and marjane are both interested in taking what
they have learned about politics and social class and
applying it to their own situation.

Which line from beethoven's moonlight sonata is not an example of the author's use of descriptive language to achieve this purpose.

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

What effects does roosevelt hope to have on americans with his apeal to emotion