Write an argument against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas. i need a well written argumentative essay that goes as following..
1. introduction.
2. first reason
3. second reason.
4. rebuttal
5. conclusion.
will give all my points away to who can type up a good essay.

Wild forest fires cause extensive damage to flora and fauna and result in destruction of man-made property in and around the area of fire.

Controlled fires are used by agriculturists and forest officials to keep wild fires at bay. It involves careful, controlled burning of certain areas of the forest, to clear it off inflammable organic matter. In the event of fire, this cleared-off area acts as a barrier for fire from spreading further.

In the process of controlled burning, several wild animals are killed and lose their habitat. Thick smoke from such man-made fires is a cause for environmental concern too

when the frogs where green they ate bugs but one day farts came upon the clouds and washed the frogs away

ieoiw what en the: enswer is b

this is what i put and it was correct

it's a way for authors to communicate with reader in this time period. books from the past can teach us about life.