Which response best explains how author mark o’mara aims to improve society in the article “gun debate? what gun debate? ”
a-o’mara presents new evidence about the usefulness of guns in society in order to gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.
b-o’mara shows the strengths of both sides of the american gun debate to gun advocates and opponents find a measure of common ground.
c-o’mara reviews the arguments of gun-rights advocates in depth in order to use emotional appeals to persuade the audience of the devastation of gun violence.
d-o’mara puts statistics about gun deaths in a new light in order to shock readers into acknowledging the devastation of gun violence.

i believe the answer is b

life 2200 right now look pretty good because on how quickly humans are advansing, life will be a breeze. most by by then would have out lawed disese.most wouldn't have to work anymore beacuse everything would be free. the econamy for most countires would be really good, also by then u.s.a would have probably would have expaned its borders.

so that counculeds my thoghts of how 2200 is you for reading

1.the hosts on two opposing mountains stood,  

2.thick as the foliage of the waving wood;  

3.between them an extensive valley lay,  

4.o'er which the gleaming armour pour'd the day,  

5.when from the camp of the philistine foes,

6. dreadful to view, a mighty warrior rose; in the dire deeds of bleeding battle skill'd,