Dante's reaction to francesca in canto v has provoked differing interpretations some read the seen as evidence that he is sympathetic to passionate love that the sin of lust is less consequence than the humanity of the lovers and that is the real moral lesson hear others believe the scene demonstrates howdangerously seductive francesa is and that love and lust are the same thing to her she is in the circle of hell because she refuses to take responsibility for her actions and what about paolo is he the seducer or the victim what do you think based on your understanding of dante what is the lesson he wants us to learn your response should be at least 500 words you should reference at least three separate passages. from canto v to support your argument

Which piece of evidence would best support reason #1? othe history of using animals for research extends asfar back as 322 bce, when early greek physician-scientists, such as aristotle and erasistratus,performed various experiments on living animals.animal research played an essential role in thedevelopment of herceptin and tamoxifen, twomedications that have already saved the lives ofthousands of women who have been diagnosed withbreast cancer.even those who believe in testing on animals when it is hnecessary for vital medical research practice what isknown as "the 3 rs-reduction, refinement, andreplacement to reduce the number of animals usedfor testing.biologists believe that chimpanzees share at least 98.4percent of the same dna as humans and gorillas shareat least 97 percent, making primates a popular andlikely choice for the testing of products intended for humans

Which of the following best describes the speaker’s feelings about america?

What does the author see as the main cause for why students don’t really see shakespeare as a real, flawed human being? we shouldn’t shy away from discussing our literary heroes’ flaws. if nothing else, the knowledge of their failures us appreciate what success and greatness these authors did achieve. often our hero-worship keeps us from truly seeing the complexity of a great author. thus, i would argue, nothing would be better for high school students than to take shakespeare down a peg or two. a) the fact that students never learn enough about shakespeares biography b) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s comedies while in school c) the fact that students are never assigned to read any shakespeare while in high school d) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s greatest works in school and thus never see his weaknesses