Will give 25 points if you answer this question correctly plus
william shakespeare
according to benvolio, who is responsible for starting the fight? check all that apply.
a. servants of the
montagues
b. servants of the capulets
c. the prince
d. tybalt
e. montague and capulet
benvolio: here were the servants of your adversary
and yours close fighting ere i did approach:
i drew to part them; in the instant came
the fiery tybalt, with his sword prepar'd,
which, as he breath'd defiance to my ears,
he swung about his head, and cut the winds,
who, nothing hurt withal hiss'd him in scorn.
while we were interchanging thrusts and blows,
came more and more, and fought on part and part,
till the prince came, who parted either part.
—romeo and juliet,

A. servants of the  Montagues .

B. servants of the Capulets .

D. Tybalt.

Explanation:

William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Ju liet" tells the story of two unfortunate lovers who had to overcome their feuding families to maintain their love. And due to that lasting hatred for each other, their families became their stumbling block leading to their deaths.

The given speech of Benvolio is from Act I scene i of the play where he explained to those assembled the cause and start of the fight between the two households. He narrates how he came upon the servants of the Capulets and the Montagues fighting in the streets. And his attempts to disperse them off was only met with more fight from Tybalt, which further escalates the fight. Only when the prince arrived did the fight break up. According to him, the fight was equally started by the servants of bot households, including Tybalt.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

i don't see any right answer. i don't know english and only math