Will be cool that u 30 ! time is runing out
read the conversation.
chairman reed. i’d like to call this meeting to order. mr. hollembeak, your willingness to meet with us today speaks to your openness and integrity in this investigation. i am looking forward to an honest and candid discussion. members of the committee, remember that we will reconvene in a closed session at 2 p. m. today to take a vote. hold your comments and questions until each statement has been read. mrs. louis, begin.
mrs. louis. you, mr. chairman. i begin by referring to my colleague’s november 22nd testimony that the files being discussed were not properly encrypted and that their security may have been compromised. were you aware of this at the time?
mr. hollembeak. i was not aware. based on the findings of an internal review board that i established after my appointment in 2016, i concluded that my department’s security protocol was up to date.
mrs. louis. i understand that you released a report of your findings on february 15th of last year. am i correct?
mr. hollembeak. you are correct.
chairman reed. do you have a copy of this report with you, mr. hollembeak?
mr. hollembeak. i do. i have it here.
chairman reed. submitted for the record, mr. hollembeak’s security report, dated february 15, 2016.
how is mr. hollembeak demonstrating appropriate behavior for participating in this discussion? select three options.
a) he has come prepared for the discussion.
b) he is following protocol for the discussion.
c) he is offering to support his point of view with further details.
d) he is withholding his questions until the end of the discussion.
e) he is using casual, accessible language that is appropriate for the discussion.

A), B), C)

Explanation:

This is the answers

A) He has come prepared for the discussion.

B) He is following protocol for the discussion.

C) He is offering to support his point of view with further details.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this