In what ways do “the lamb” and “the tyger” represent opposite sides of human existence? a. “the lamb” urges passive control, while “the tyger” glorifies man’s dominance over nature. b. “the lamb” urges meek acceptance, while “the tyger” glorifies nature and power. c. “the lamb” urges childlike faith, while “the tyger” glorifies man’s experience.

“The Lamb” and “The Tyger” represent opposite sides of human existence in such a way as “The Lamb” urges passive control, while “The Tyger” glorifies dominance of man over nature.

A

Explanation

In William Blake's “Songs of Innocence and of experience”, he introduces to two chapters distinctively, one is “The Lamb” and other is “The Tyger”.

Through this, he shows many aspects of a single soul.

He praises God and shows his audience that the same God who can make a serene and calm animal like the lamb is also capable of making the ferocious and powerful tiger.

anyone who was dealing with communism in soviet union in his time had an ideal picture of equality, freedom, the struggle of the working class for a better future, the success of the aristocracy's overthrow and the emancipation of subjugation.   however, anyone who would go to soviet union to see the functioning of the communist system, would be convinced that it was about sad people, about everyday bad life, about the brutal attitude of communist leaders, about ill obsession to completely exterminate every thought on aristocracy. thus, orwell wanted to show all the absurdity, the brutality of the system, the unbearable rule of suspicious morality, the ignorant people who try to play professionally.

the answers are: b. and e.