Can anyone figure out the central idea of this aphorism? admiration at their novelty heightens the value of your achievements, it is both useless and insipid to play with the cards on the table. if you do not declare yourself immediately, you arouse expectation, especially when the importance of your position makes you the object of general attention. mix a little mystery with everything, and the very mystery arouses veneration. and when you explain, be not too explicit, just as you do not expose your inmost thoughts in ordinary intercourse. cautious silence is the holy of holies of worldly wisdom. a resolution declared is never highly thought of; it only leaves room for criticism. and if it happens to fail, you are doubly unfortunate. besides you imitate the divine way when you cause men to wonder and watch.

i don't see any questions on your profile, currently, but i'd be happy to try and with any problems that you have, so long as i understand the problem myself.

the statement that best explains why the tenth amendment reserves some rights and powers to states is that the framers believed in the principle of federalism. this principle says that some powers are in the hands of a centralized national government, while others are reserved for the governments of several states.

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.