subject
English, 04.02.2020 02:57 beautycutieforever10

Ineed fast

2. how does darrow use rhetoric to advance his purpose in the excerpt of his closing argument in illinois v. nathan leopold and richard loeb? provide two or more examples of rhetoric darrow uses and the intended effect of the rhetoric. use evidence from the passage to support your response. your response should be one or two complete paragraphs.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
The wizard of oz provides an example of a universal idea that connects with most readers. dorothy is lost in oz. during her journey, she comes to understand that there is no place like home. the author, l. frank baum, includes colorful descriptions to readers picture the strange place where dorothy has landed. this to convey the feeling of being lost. most readers can relate to this feeling through a variety of personal experiences. this universal truth allows readers to connect to the character, and in turn to feel less lonely and isolated themselves. which literary terms should be included in this body paragraph? check all that apply. characterization imagery irony theme setting
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
Read this excerpt from leah missbach day's foreword to wheels of change.as wbr's resident photographer i am privileged to see firsthand the impact bicycles have on the lives of our recipients.why does the author include this excerpt?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:50
What about the sentence structure in this passage build suspense
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Ineed fast

2. how does darrow use rhetoric to advance his purpose in the excerpt of...
Questions
question
English, 13.09.2019 02:30
Questions on the website: 13722363