Read this entence from line 3 of "are our nations treasures in danger" "by their sheer numbers ,these people are putting our nations top outdoor atraction at "does the author provide suficient evidense to support the claim that high numbers of turists sre a potential danger to some national park sites? use two details from the article to support your response

In my opinion, those two sentences do not provide enough evidence to fully support the claim. However, you could say that one detail used to support the claim is that the source specifically states, "...by their sheer numbers ,these people are putting our nation's top outdoor attraction at risk." There is no more evidence provided as to where you could say it supports the claim.

Hope I helped!

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.